The task is clear
Everyone understands the goal quickly: rank the items from most to least important.
For facilitators
Protocol 15 gives facilitators a structured survival ranking activity that naturally creates discussion, disagreement, and debrief material.
You create the room, invite participants, keep teams moving, reveal the guide comparison, and use the result to discuss priorities, assumptions, influence, and tradeoffs. The product handles the mechanics so you can focus on the room.
Why this format works
Participants cannot say every item matters equally. They have to defend priorities, challenge assumptions, negotiate disagreement, and commit to one shared answer.
That tension creates the discussion. The reveal gives you a concrete way to ask why the group chose what it chose.
Everyone understands the goal quickly: rank the items from most to least important.
The hard part is not using the interface. It is deciding what the team believes.
Scores, item gaps, and guide comparison give the debrief something specific to work with.
What you actually do
Protocol 15 handles joining, teams, timing, rankings, scoring, and the reveal. The facilitator keeps the session moving and pays attention to how the group reaches a decision.
What facilitators usually notice
The ranking round gives you live material to bring back during the debrief. Watch how the room handles pressure, confidence, disagreement, and influence.
One participant driving the list before others have weighed in
Teams optimizing for speed instead of reasoning
Strong assumptions spreading without challenge
Quiet participants changing the answer late
Different groups solving the same problem in opposite ways
Priorities shifting when the clock starts to matter
Debrief prompts
You do not need a lecture after the reveal. Use the team ranking, the guide comparison, and the room's visible disagreements to ask practical questions.
Which item caused the biggest disagreement?
What assumption shaped your ranking most?
Where did the group change its mind?
What mattered more: certainty or survival?
How did time pressure affect the discussion?
Who influenced the final decision, and how?
Session confidence
The activity is designed to create discussion naturally. The scenario gives pressure, the ranking forces a decision, and the reveal gives the group a shared result to inspect.
Browse ScenariosPlan for about 25-40 minutes: a short setup, one focused ranking round, a reveal, and a debrief that can expand if the discussion is strong.
Run the room
Participants join free. No accounts or downloads.