The task is clear
Everyone understands the goal quickly: rank the items from most to least important.
For facilitators
A ready-made scenario, one shared ranking for each team, live session controls, and a clear reveal.
Create the room, share one link, and start in minutes. You guide the group; the exercise gives you specific decisions, disagreements, and changes of mind to explore afterward. Protocol15 supports facilitated reflection. It is not a diagnostic assessment of individuals or teams.
Why this format works
Participants cannot say every item matters equally. They have to defend priorities, challenge assumptions, negotiate disagreement, and commit to one shared answer.
That tension creates the discussion. The reveal gives you a concrete way to ask why the group chose what it chose.
Everyone understands the goal quickly: rank the items from most to least important.
The hard part is not using the interface. It is deciding what the team believes.
The team’s choices, item gaps, and turning points give you something specific to explore.
In-the-room interventions
Use the lightest prompt that restores participation or movement. Keep the survival answer with the team and return control to the discussion quickly.
Pause the ranking and ask each person to name one priority or concern before the controller moves another item.
Ask for one view that has not been heard yet, then give the group a few silent seconds before anyone answers.
Name the unresolved tradeoff and ask which risk the group is more willing to accept. Set a short decision deadline.
Remind the room that control is an input role, not authority. Ask the controller to release it after the next agreed move.
What you actually do
Protocol15 handles joining, teams, timing, rankings, scoring, and the reveal. You keep the session moving and bring the group's choices and turning points into the debrief.
Useful moments to discuss
The ranking round gives you material for the debrief. Bring back the choices, questions, and turning points that made the group pause or change its mind.
A fast answer before every idea has been heard
A choice the team cannot easily explain
An assumption the group treats as fact
A late comment that changes the ranking
Two teams reaching different answers
A priority that changes once the timer is running
Debrief prompts
You do not need a lecture after the reveal. Use the team ranking and reference comparison to ask practical questions about the choices the group made.
Which item caused the biggest disagreement?
What assumption shaped your ranking most?
Where did the group change its mind?
What mattered more: certainty or survival?
How did time pressure affect the discussion?
Who influenced the final decision, and how?
Session confidence
The scenario gives the group a concrete problem, and one shared ranking requires a decision. The reveal gives you another perspective on choices and turning points that already happened in the room.
Browse ScenariosPlan for about 25-40 minutes: a short setup, one focused ranking round, a reveal, and a debrief that can expand if the discussion is strong.
Run the room
Participants join free. No accounts or downloads.